Undersea Cable Geopolitics in the Indo-Pacific: The New Battlefield for Digital Sovereignty and Strategic Influence

The Indo-Pacific region has emerged as the epicentre of a new form of great power competition, where the battlefield lies not on land or sea, but beneath the ocean floor in the form of fibre-optic cables that carry the world's digital lifeblood. These submarine communication cables, which transmit over 95% of global intercontinental data traffic, have transformed from mere technological infrastructure into critical instruments of geopolitical influence, economic leverage, and national security. As digital economies expand and artificial intelligence reshapes global commerce, control over these underwater arteries has become synonymous with control over the 21st-century information economy. India's strategic positioning in this evolving landscape, marked by ambitious infrastructure investments and multilateral security partnerships, represents a pivotal shift in the region's digital architecture and geopolitical balance.

The Strategic Architecture of Global Digital Infrastructure

The Physical Foundation of Digital Power

Submarine cables constitute the backbone of global internet infrastructure, carrying approximately 97% of worldwide data traffic through nearly 600 cable systems spanning 1.4 million kilometres of ocean floor. The global submarine cable market, valued at $31.70 billion in 2024, is projected to reach $44.33 billion by 2030, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 5.6% driven by increasing data demands and offshore renewable energy projects. This infrastructure represents far more than technical connectivity; it embodies the fundamental architecture of digital sovereignty and economic interdependence in the modern world.

The Indo-Pacific region has become the focal point of this expansion, with the area between 2020 and 2023 witnessing unprecedented growth in cable deployment. Western Europe led global expansion with 23 new cable launches, while both developed and emerging Asia-Pacific regions each added 12 new systems during this period. This surge reflects not only growing data demands but also the strategic recognition among nations that cable infrastructure represents a form of economic and political influence.

India's Digital Transformation and Infrastructure Imperatives

India's remarkable digital evolution over the past decade provides crucial context for understanding its strategic cable investments. The country's internet subscriber base has grown from 251.59 million in 2014 to 954.40 million in 2024, representing a staggering 279% increase. Simultaneously, average download speeds have improved from 4.18 Mbps to 105.85 Mbps, a 2,432% improvement that has elevated India from 130th to 16th globally in internet speed rankings. Data costs have plummeted by 96.58%, from ₹268.97 per GB to ₹9.18, while average consumption per user has increased from 0.26 GB to 20.27 GB monthly .

India's remarkable digital transformation over the past decade, showing massive growth in connectivity and accessibility

This transformation has created both opportunities and vulnerabilities for India's digital infrastructure. Currently, India hosts only 1-3% of global cable capacity despite its massive digital economy, which is projected to reach $1 trillion 5. The concentration of India's cable landing points in Mumbai and Chennai creates significant strategic vulnerabilities, as demonstrated by the 2024 Red Sea cable cuts that temporarily affected 25% of India's internet connectivity 5. The upcoming deployment of multiple next-generation cable systems, including the India-Asia-Express (IAX), India-Europe-Express (IEX), 2Africa Pearls, Blue Raman, and MIST cables, is expected to quadruple India's data transmission capacity by 2025.

China's Digital Silk Road and the PEACE Cable Strategy

The Geopolitical Architecture of Digital Connectivity

China's Digital Silk Road represents a comprehensive strategy to establish technological dominance through infrastructure control, with the PEACE (Pakistan and East Africa Connecting Europe) cable serving as its flagship maritime project. This 15,000-kilometer system, operational since 2024, directly connects China to Pakistan, East Africa, and Europe while conspicuously bypassing India . The cable's strategic significance extends beyond mere connectivity; it embodies China's broader ambition to create alternative digital pathways that reduce dependence on Western-controlled infrastructure and establish new centers of technological influence.

The PEACE cable's route through the Mediterranean Sea, Red Sea, and Indian Ocean creates multiple strategic implications for regional security. By providing Pakistan with direct, low-latency connectivity to China, Africa, and Europe, the system potentially enhances Chinese surveillance capabilities in the Western Indian Ocean while strengthening the digital cohesion of Belt and Road Initiative partner nations 5. The cable's landing sites in Gwadar, Pakistan, and Djibouti anchor Chinese presence at critical maritime chokepoints, raising concerns about potential dual-use applications for military communications and intelligence gathering.

Technical Specifications and Strategic Capabilities

The engineering complexity of submarine cables reflects their strategic importance. Modern cables consist of multiple protective layers surrounding optical fibers, with diameters typically measuring 25 millimeters and designed for 25-year operational lifespans. The PEACE cable's advanced specifications enable transmission rates of up to 15 terabits per second, sufficient to handle the data demands of entire nations while providing redundancy for critical communications.

These technical capabilities translate into significant geopolitical leverage. Cable operators can potentially monitor, intercept, or manipulate data flows, capabilities that become particularly concerning when cables are controlled by state-owned entities with military connections 5. The civil-military fusion aspects of Chinese cable operations raise particular alarm among democratic nations, as evidenced by growing restrictions on Chinese companies' participation in cable projects across the Indo-Pacific.

The Quad Response and Multilateral Security Architecture

Partnership for Cable Connectivity and Resilience

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue's Partnership for Cable Connectivity and Resilience, launched in May 2023, represents the most comprehensive multilateral response to submarine cable security challenges in the Indo-Pacific. This initiative encompasses four key pillars: enhanced coordination on cable construction and security, information sharing on physical and cyber threats, development of common standards and protocols, and deployment of advanced monitoring technologies including autonomous underwater vehicles.

The Quad's approach reflects a broader shift from viewing cables as purely commercial infrastructure to recognizing them as critical national security assets requiring active protection and strategic planning. Member nations have committed over $140 million for undersea cable installation in the Indo-Pacific, with particular focus on providing alternatives to Chinese-controlled systems in vulnerable island nations.. This investment strategy aims to create redundant pathways that reduce regional dependence on potentially compromised infrastructure while strengthening democratic values in digital governance.

Technological Innovation and Defence Capabilities

Recent cable incidents have accelerated development of protective technologies and rapid response capabilities . Taiwan reported five cases of seabed cable damage in 2024 alone, compared to just three cases each in 2023 and 2024, highlighting the increasing frequency of suspicious incidents . The November 2024 Baltic Sea cable disruptions, involving the Chinese cargo ship Yi Peng 3, exemplify the hybrid warfare tactics increasingly targeting submarine infrastructure .

In response, defense contractors have developed sophisticated monitoring and protection systems . Companies like Saab Australia offer autonomous underwater vehicles capable of persistent monitoring, while Thales Australia's Blue Sentry technology employs thin-line towed arrays for threat detection . These systems can operate at depths up to 6,000 meters and possess the capability to reprogram themselves mid-mission, adapting to emerging threats in real-time .

Vulnerabilities and Strategic Chokepoints

Physical and Cyber Security Challenges

Global submarine cable networks face approximately 100-200 incidents annually, with most damage resulting from fishing activities, ship anchors, or natural disasters. However, the increasing frequency of suspicious incidents suggests a growing trend toward deliberate sabotage and hybrid warfare tactics . The 2024 East Africa cable outage, which damaged both SEACOM and EASSy cables off South Africa's coast, demonstrates how single incidents can affect multiple countries simultaneously .

The Indo-Pacific's cable network traverses several critical chokepoints that represent both strategic assets and vulnerabilities . The Bab-el-Mandeb and Red Sea routes, essential for Europe-Asia connectivity, have experienced repeated disruptions from Houthi attacks and cable cuts . The Strait of Malacca and South China Sea, with their dense cable traffic and overlapping territorial claims, remain particularly susceptible to both accidental and deliberate disruptions.

Repair Capabilities and Strategic Dependencies

Cable repair represents a critical vulnerability in global communications infrastructure, with limited numbers of specialized vessels and repair capabilities concentrated among a few operators. The dependence on Chinese repair ships, particularly those operated by SBSS (Submarine Cable Services), creates strategic vulnerabilities as these vessels can be denied access or potentially used for espionage during crisis situations 5. The Quad initiative specifically addresses this challenge by proposing leasing arrangements for cable repair ships and enhanced coordination for rapid response capabilities .

Economic Implications and Market Dynamics

Investment Patterns and Strategic Ownership

The submarine cable market's growth trajectory reflects broader shifts in global digital infrastructure investment .Hyperscalers including Google, Meta, Amazon, and Microsoft have emerged as major investors, with at least 40 operational submarine cables expected to be owned or part-owned by these companies by 2026. This trend toward private ownership of critical infrastructure creates new governance challenges, as commercial interests may not always align with national security priorities.

India's cable investment strategy reflects this evolving landscape, with domestic giants Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel leading multiple projects. The India-Asia-Express and India-Europe-Express cables, both planned for 2025 operation, represent investments exceeding $2 billion in enhanced regional connectivity. These projects position India as a regional digital hub while reducing dependence on Chinese-controlled systems.

Regional Economic Integration and Digital Trade

The economic implications of cable connectivity extend far beyond telecommunications costs to encompass digital trade, financial services, and technological innovation. India's digital economy, supported by platforms like UPI and Aadhaar, requires robust international bandwidth that current infrastructure cannot adequately support 5. The projected fourfold increase in capacity from new cable systems will enable expanded digital services exports and enhanced integration with global supply chains.

The broader Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF) negotiations incorporate cable connectivity as a fundamental component of digital trade agreements 5. These discussions seek to establish common standards for data flows, privacy protection, and infrastructure security while balancing openness with sovereignty concerns 5. For India, participation in these frameworks provides opportunities to shape regional digital norms while securing access to trusted, high-capacity data corridors.

Strategic Challenges and Future Scenarios

Balancing Connectivity and Security

The tension between connectivity and security represents the fundamental challenge in Indo-Pacific cable governance . European approaches emphasize resilience through redundancy and rapid repair capabilities, while Indo-Pacific strategies focus on connectivity security through route control and vendor restrictions . Reconciling these approaches requires integrated policy frameworks that address both physical protection and supply chain security.

Regional coordination faces significant obstacles, including divergent threat perceptions, legal gaps, and capacity constraints 5. ASEAN member states display varied approaches, with some prioritizing connectivity over security concerns, leading to fragmented regional responses 5. Building effective regional institutions for cable security requires addressing these disparities while ensuring smaller states' interests are protected.

Technological Evolution and Emerging Threats

The integration of artificial intelligence and quantum computing technologies will fundamentally alter submarine cable requirements and vulnerabilities. Next-generation cables must accommodate massive data flows while incorporating enhanced security features to prevent quantum-based attacks. The development of space-based alternatives, including low Earth orbit satellite constellations, provides potential redundancy but cannot match submarine cables' capacity and cost-effectiveness.

Climate change represents an emerging threat to cable infrastructure, with rising sea levels, intensifying storms, and changing ocean currents potentially affecting cable routes and landing stations. Adaptation strategies must incorporate environmental resilience alongside security concerns, particularly for vulnerable island nations dependent on single cable connections.

Conclusion: Toward Digital Sovereignty and Regional Stability

The geopolitics of undersea cables in the Indo-Pacific reflects broader contestation over technological leadership, economic influence, and regional order in the 21st century. India's transformation from a passive recipient of connectivity to an active architect of digital infrastructure represents a critical shift in regional power dynamics. The country's strategic investments in cable projects, participation in multilateral security frameworks, and development of indigenous digital capabilities position it as a key player in shaping the future of Indo-Pacific connectivity.

However, significant challenges remain in building resilient, secure, and inclusive digital infrastructure. The fragmentation of regional coordination, capacity constraints among smaller nations, and the persistent threat of hybrid warfare against critical infrastructure require sustained attention and resources. The success of initiatives like the Quad Partnership for Cable Connectivity and Resilience will ultimately depend on their ability to provide attractive alternatives to authoritarian-controlled systems while addressing the legitimate connectivity needs of all regional stakeholders.

The future of Indo-Pacific digital governance will be determined not only by the cables traversing the ocean floor but by the institutions, norms, and partnerships that govern them. As the region continues its digital transformation, the imperative for democratic nations remains clear: to construct a secure, sovereign, and inclusive digital infrastructure capable of withstanding both technological disruption and geopolitical turbulence. The stakes could not be higher, as control over these invisible arteries of information may well determine which values and systems shape the digital future of the world's most dynamic region.

Reference 

1.      Akin Gump. 2022. “USTR and DOC Seeking Public Comments on Digital Trade Issues.” Akin Gump, March 18, 2022. https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/alerts/ustr-and-doc-seeking-public-comments-on-digital-trade-issues.html.

2.      Air University. 2023. “Securing the Digital Seabed: Countering China's Underwater.” Air University, November 14, 2023. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/3598234/securing-the-digital-seabed-countering-chinas-underwater/.

3.      Analysys Mason. 2024. “Submarine Cable Launch Numbers Have Surged since 2020 and Another 68 Cables Are Expected by 2027.” Analysys Mason, May 16, 2024. https://www.analysysmason.com/research/content/articles/submarine-cable-launches-rma22-rdfi0/.

4.      Business Standard. 2022. “Indian Digital Infra Needs Investment of up to $23 Bn by 2025: Report.” Business Standard, January 24, 2022. https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/indian-digital-infra-needs-investment-of-up-to-23-bn-by-2025-report-122012400199_1.html.

5.      Cannon, Brendon J., and Priya Bhatt. 2024. “The Quad and Submarine Cable Protection in the Indo-Pacific: Policy Recommendations.” Institute for Security and Development Policy, January 30, 2024. https://isdp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Brief-Cannon-Jan-25-2023-final3-updated.pdf.

6.      Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2024. “A Chinese-Flagged Ship Cut Baltic Sea Internet Cables. This Time NATO Is Watching.” Carnegie Emissary, December 3, 2024. https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2024/12/baltic-sea-internet-cable-cut-europe-nato-security?lang=en.

7.      CSIS. 2024. “Safeguarding Subsea Cables: Protecting Cyber Infrastructure.” Center for Strategic and International Studies, August 16, 2024. https://www.csis.org/analysis/safeguarding-subsea-cables-protecting-cyber-infrastructure.

8.      Defense News. 2025. “With Indo-Pacific Undersea Cables at Risk, Companies Tout Their Tech.” Defense News, April 25, 2025. https://www.defensenews.com/global/asia-pacific/2025/04/25/with-indo-pacific-undersea-cables-at-risk-companies-tout-their-tech/.

9.      Grand View Research. 2024. “Submarine Cables Market Size, Share & Industry Report 2030.” Grand View Research. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/submarine-cables-market.

10. Hosting Journalist. 2024. “PEACE Undersea Cable Now Connecting Asia to Europe.” Hosting Journalist, September 4, 2024. https://hostingjournalist.com/news/peace-undersea-cable-now-connecting-asia-to-europe.

11. India Briefing. 2024. “India’s Three Subsea Cable Projects to Go Live by 2025.” India Briefing, August 28, 2024. https://www.india-briefing.com/news/india-three-subsea-cable-projects-launch-march-2025-34116.html/.

12. Internet Society. 2024. “2024 East Africa Submarine Cable Outage Report.” Internet Society. https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2024/2024-east-africa-submarine-cable-outage-report/.

13. IP Defense Forum. 2024. “Indo-Pacific Nations Bolstering Defense of Undersea Cables against Emerging Vulnerabilities.” IP Defense Forum, September 17, 2024. https://ipdefenseforum.com/2024/09/indo-pacific-nations-bolstering-defense-of-undersea-cables-against-emerging-vulnerabilities/.

14. ISDP. 2024. “The Quad and Submarine Cable Protection in the Indo-Pacific.” Institute for Security and Development Policy, January 30, 2024. https://www.isdp.eu/publication/the-quad-and-submarine-cable-protection-in-the-indo-pacific-policy-recommendations/.

15. Light Reading. 2024. “2024 in Review: Submarine Cables Become a Battleground.” Light Reading, December 30, 2024. https://www.lightreading.com/cable-technology/2024-in-review-submarine-cables-become-a-battleground.

16. Ministry of Communications, Government of India. 2024. “Internet Connectivity under Digital India Initiative.” DD News. https://ddnews.gov.in/en/centre-boosts-internet-connectivity-across-india-under-digital-india-initiative/.

17. ORC Asia. 2023. “Digital Silk Road: Beijing's Digital Footprint and Its Political Implications.” ORC Asia, February 8, 2023. https://www.orcasia.org/digital-silk-road.

18. South China Morning Post. 2024. “Will India's Undersea Cable Overhaul Make It a Global Data Powerhouse?” South China Morning Post, December 25, 2024. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3292192/will-indias-undersea-cable-overhaul-make-it-global-data-powerhouse.